Publications

@article{Moller2017,
title = {Transcranial Electric Stimulation Can Impair Gains during Working Memory Training and Affects the Resting State Connectivity},
author = {Annie Möller and Federico Nemmi and Kim Karlsson and Torkel Klingberg},
doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2017.00364},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
volume = {11},
number = {July},
pages = {1--12},
abstract = {Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) is a promising technique that has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance and enhance the effect of cognitive training. However, experimental set up and electrode placement are not always determined based on neurofunctional knowledge about WM, leading to inconsistent results. Additional research on the effects of tES grounded on neurofunctional evidence is therefore necessary. 60 young, healthy, volunteers, assigned to 6 different groups, participated in 5 days of stimulation or sham treatment. 25 of these subjects also participated in MRI acquisition. We performed 3 experiments: In the first one we evaluated tES using either direct current stimulation (tDCS) with bilateral stimulation of the frontal or parietal lobe; in the second one we used the same tDCS protocol with a different electrode placement (i.e. supraorbital cathode); in the third one we used alternating currents (tACS) of 35 Hz, applied bilaterally to either the frontal or parietal lobes. The behavioral outcome measure was the WM capacity (i.e. number of remembered spatial position) during the 5 days of training. In a subsample of subjects we evaluated the neural effects of tDCS by measuring resting state connectivity with functional MRI, before and after the 5 days of tDCS and visuo-spatial WM training. We found a significant impairment of WM training-related gains associated with parietal tACS and frontal tDCS. Five days of tDCS stimulation was also associated with significant change in resting state connectivity revealed by multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). None of the stimulation paradigms resulted in improved WM performance or enhanced WM training gains. These results show that tES can have negative effects on cognitive plasticity and affect resting-state functional connectivity.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Westerberg2007a,
title = {Computerized working memory training after stroke–A pilot study},
author = {H Westerberg and H Jacobaeus and T Hirvikoski and P Clevberger and M -L Östensson and A Bartfai and T Klingberg},
url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699050601148726},
doi = {10.1080/02699050601148726},
issn = {0269-9052},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {21},
number = {1},
pages = {21--29},
abstract = {Aim: To examine the effects of working memory (WM) training in adult patients with stroke. Methods: A randomized pilot study with a treatment group and a passive control group; 18 participants (12 males) in a vocational age group (mean age 54 years) were randomized to either the treatment or the control condition. The intervention consisted of computerized training on various WM tasks for five weeks. A neuropsychological test battery and self-rating on cognitive functioning in daily life (the CFQ) were administered both before and after the treatment. Results: Statistically significant training effects were found on the non-trained tests for WM and attention, i.e., tests that measure related cognitive functions but are not identical to tasks in the training programme (Span board p textless 0.05; PASAT p textless 0.001; Ruff 2 & 7 p textless 0.005). There was a significant decrease in symptoms of cognitive problems as measured by the CFQ (p textless 0.005). Conclusion: More than one year after a stroke, systematic WM training can significantly improve WM and attention.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}